How do suspects typically phrase their denial when they may not want to directly lie?

When suspects deny involvement in a situation but prefer not to outright lie, they often utilize phrases that suggest hypothetical scenarios rather than definitive statements of fact. The phrase "I wouldn’t do it" indicates a conditional stance. It implies that under certain circumstances, the suspect believes they would not engage in the alleged behavior, which can allow for ambiguity and distance from the actual event. It reflects a reluctance to make a firm denial, thereby avoiding direct confrontation with the claim against them.

In contrast, other phrases such as "I didn’t do it" or "I’m innocent" assert a clear denial of guilt, which might seem too confrontational or definitive for someone who is trying to navigate the situation carefully. Similarly, "You must be mistaken" casts doubt on the accuser's claims, but is also more direct in contradicting the assertion rather than implying a hypothetical scenario. The use of hypothetical phrasing shows a blend of denial while keeping some room for interpretation, which can be a strategic choice by suspects when they want to distance themselves from the allegation without lying outright.