In which type of reasoning do you conduct a study to infer a general statement?

Inductive reasoning is the process of drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or data. In this type of reasoning, you collect and analyze evidence from particular instances or examples, which allows you to formulate broader generalizations or hypotheses. For instance, if you conduct multiple studies and observe a consistent outcome, you may conclude a general principle that applies in similar situations. This approach is essential in research and scientific inquiry, where repeated observations can lead to valuable insights that go beyond the initial data.

In contrast, deductive reasoning involves starting with a general statement or hypothesis and examining the possibilities to reach a specific conclusion, while abductive reasoning focuses on finding the best explanation for an observation. Reactive reasoning, on the other hand, isn't a standard term in logical reasoning frameworks, and it does not align with the established categories of reasoning methods.